Ultimately, the important thing is stay with any of these three solutions are first rate. Each account with strengths and areas for improvement, but surely none of they will have the feeling of having made a bad choice. AVID, with all its editing and composition solutions would have a market share of 45-50% Final 35-40%, Adobe Premiere 15% Cut, especially on small producers. After Effects dominates the market of graphic art and FX in medium-sized production companies (which are the majority). The very large (which are few) type Discreet inferno, mysticism, or AVID Symphony will go towards solutions of composition. And even these use After FX to simpler things. As a curiosity, in the Texel video production company we have used three solutions, and we have been pleased with all of them. There are other minority softwares in the industry (in order from highest to lowest use) as Vegas Video, Edius, Media Studio, or Cinelarra (this is for Linux).
Although one is quite popular in the domestic sector (Vegas), there are few producers who use it. (5%?) Both Vegas and Edius are quite similar to the three major systems, both in performance and in use. Its lower implementation, versatility and connectivity drag his takeoff. Producer of video Texel is a leading company in the sector of audiovisual services to companies. It has an infrastructure of last generation and a highly qualified human team. Blogs similar Adobe After Effects Template Customization by mindpeace My Autodesk videos from GDC CG Channel HUELVA actors en Paco Huelva Crisol De San Felipe fell Palaco * position of bread * wins the 15 most womanizing Hollywood actors ‘ paratipos.com EOS MOVIE Plugin-E1 for Final Cut Pro IPhone 4.0 Do new Apple Software for multi-tasking on IPhone facilitates new software for DivX transcode videos to computers and Final Cut Pro or Final Cut Express?