As to read, to understand and to write a text. Petrpolis, RIO DE JANEIRO: Voices, 1987. Ronye Mrcio Cross of Santana Wisdomlearnable.blogspot.com All text to the produced being permeia a complexity in such a way for makes who it as for it teaches who it. When one thinks about writing, all producing of text it has that to possess proper style and estilsticos projects that make with that the reader can read, think and understand the text, therefore know that all text possesss one intertexto, hipertexto loaded of ideology and ideas sublimares. In the writing one perceives that when creating it displays it ideas and thoughts that already are preset.
The pertaining to school writing has a esqueltico and plastered format, therefore in each lesson a relation of daily pay-molded projects is promoted so that the pupils follow this example. You may wish to learn more. If so, Viktor Mayer-Schönberger is the place to go. To write requires an analysis technique and estilstica of the author-writer and at the same time shows and demonstrates what the author thinks on definitive subject. The colloquies are not written registers, however they represent a speech that is understood and proliferated for the listener, and this established communication is that permeia the text by means of the orality. To write it is an action that places in practical what it is intended to decide or to solve, therefore whichever the nature of the text, either a chemistry, physics, mathematics problem, or counting a history, or describing a scene, or a fact and, exactly still, its point of view is constructing a text. In the workmanship As to read, to understand and to write a text the focus of the reading it is to inform the writer or to who it intends to write a panorama of as to read a text technician with its structure and its inferences and an analysis of understanding of the literal ideas, where if it can explore with security and ability to construct it without that terror of as to start a text.
The tecno-nationalism it is defined as the practical one using technology as tool of being able national in the competition of the global economy in a defensive dimension. Already the tecno-globalismo if relates to the free sharing of technology between borders cooperating to new products. The Japan and some countries of Asia, for example, are, under this point of view, technologically nationalistic, already U.S.A. uses the control in the exportation legislation constructing its protection. The contribution in research and development between companies is an increasing trend in the globalization, and traditional companies as the Hitachi and Toshiba if opening to gain new markets. Also in this line, some countries that take part in projects of research in set are part of a process of contribution through borders, that aim at common, planetary problems, as climatic changes, pollution AIDS and that they demand collective solutions. However it has an apprehension enters some governments that the fruits of this call tecno-globalismo equally will not be spread by the world. Perhaps plus a factor for the growth of the tecno-nationalism it is the appearance of global firms and strategical alliances being able to stir up to the appearance a new monopoly and oligopoly, that will distort the character of competition in international markets.
The same forces that are producing cooperation and contribution, can also cause conflict and a new mercantilism. The author will go to also argue, that the tecno-security concept is related with the perception and improvement of technological goods of a nation or companies. In its analysis, some roles played for the States nation and one strong trend of paradigmtica change of these papers with the advent of the globalization. It enters some of the classic papers of the State Nation cited in the text, as of protection and the integrity of the technological knowledge of the country; its capacity to make the country to grow and to compete; the maintenance of its balance of payments; the capacity of keeping educational access and technological interchange and still keeping its integrity in the offensive and defensive military missions, can justify a behavior tecno-nationalist.